A new name for a new era: honouring St Vincent’s indigenous past

EDITOR: As we reflect on the recent Indigenous Peoples’ Day and Independence Day, I propose that we engage in a collective discussion—both in St Vincent and within our diaspora, which includes the Garifuna communities—to address three crucial questions: How do we continue to honour and elevate the first peoples of this archipelago we call Saint Vincent and the Grenadines? Are there any regional initiatives or constitutional language that acknowledges and protects the rights of indigenous peoples here? And finally, how do we take meaningful steps to answer these first two questions?

Growing up, I was often told that my fore bearers were “Red Indian”—a term that’s offensive and outdated. As an adult, DNA testing confirmed my indigenous ancestry, giving me a renewed sense of connection to the Arawak, Carib (Kalinago), and Garifuna peoples who shaped the islands’ early history. Although I hold dual citizenship in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, which my father secured for me in the 1990s, I feel a disconnect. While we’ve gained independence from Britain, we still bear a colonial name that seems to distance us from our indigenous roots.

This prompts a deeper question about identity. If we are serious about honouring the legacy of these indigenous groups, then why don’t we officially reflect this in our national identity? Would a name like “Yurumein” (your-o-main) or “Hairoun” better represent our heritage and honour those who first called this land home? I can’t be the first to suggest this idea, and it’s time to give it the serious consideration it deserves.

Why a Name Change Matters

Renaming our country would go beyond symbolism. It would recognize and affirm the contributions of the Arawak, Kalinago, and Garifuna peoples, fostering a sense of unity and pride rooted in our true heritage. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines could lead the Americas by taking this bold step, setting a precedent for how nations can honour their indigenous past at the highest level. Moreover, a name change could boost our tourism industry by attracting visitors who are curious about indigenous cultures. Countries like New Zealand, where Māori culture is integrated into the national identity, have seen similar tourism benefits. By embracing our indigenous heritage, we could offer a unique and enriching experience to visitors from around the world.

Addressing Potential Costs

Rebranding would come with costs, of course. Changing official documents, signage, and online resources would require investment. Businesses, especially small ones, might face expenses to update branding and legal documents. However, this process can be made manageable with a phased approach, allowing both the public and private sectors to gradually adapt.

Next Steps: Moving Forward

Meaningful readdress starts by establishing official recognition and protections for our indigenous heritage. We need constitutional language that acknowledges the legacy of the Arawak, Kalinago, and Garifuna peoples, and we should actively support regional initiatives that elevate indigenous voices. This is about more than just a name; it’s a call to recognize, respect, and honour those who came before us.
It’s also essential to clarify that my idea doesn’t nullify the contributions of my European, African, or East Indian ancestors. Rather, it acknowledges that we are all part of this nation’s tapestry.

Embracing our indigenous

heritage is a historical correction—a necessary step toward a more complete and united national identity. By answering these questions and taking action, we can ensure our identity truly reflects our diverse and resilient history.

Hanif Barnwell
(Minnesota,USA)