Eustace’s claim of fraud not supported by fact
Concerning the allegation of the election being fraudulent in Central Leeward and that at a polling station more persons voted than the number registered to vote; here are the facts as they appear in each polling station:
Polling Registered Votes
Division voters cast
CL A 505 385
CL A1 443 343
CL B 310 238
CL B1 266 210
CL C 410 307
CL D 396 310
CL D 1 434 327
CL E 472 368
CL E 1 504 371
CL F 280 222
CL F1 337 290
CL G 397 313
CL H 494 344
CL I 438 355
CL I 1 416 312
This information can be found in SEARCHLIGHT NEWSPAPER, dated December 11, 2015 and found on page 22.
Also how absurd it is now to claim that there were 320 illegal votes. The last polling station, A, has registered voters of 505 and CL E 1, 504. Letâs say for argument that the 320 is divided equally, it means that there would 160 each from both polling stations. A close examination will show that if you deduct those 160 from any of the polling stations you will have less than the amount of votes that were cast in 2010 in any of the polling stations. For clarification, check Searchlight of December 4 on page 37 and do your own maths.
Maybe I am a dunce and donât know maths, but I have not seen anywhere according to these data that there were 100 per cent turnout at any polling station and also more than 100 per cent as claimed by ARNHIM EUSTACE.
I can, therefore, conclude that Eustace was set up and as an immature leader never checked his facts. For, if he had done so, he would have realized that what he is claiming is totally false and so has refused to accept his defeat as a big man. He is further playing on the emotions of his supporters.
Following this drama, I am predicting that Arnhim Eustace would be replaced as leader of the party. This will then give rise to a by-election, since Eustace would then resign.
God in his wisdom knows why, despite the many sexual allegations made against the PM, the ULP was returned back to office. Can you imagine under NDP there would be a discussion on same sex marriage led by Vynnette Frederick and churches facing hard times, since according to Daniel Cummings, who stoned church,
that the church he stoned was operating illegally? It is possible that we would, under NDP government, experience hooliganism and no respect for Godâs house, as evidenced at Lynchâs funeral where the church was desecrated and hooliganism took place. The Lord
has his reasons for not allowing NDP to form government, although they came so close on two occasions. Let JAH be praised.
Political Analyst