National Insurance Services  and Pension Reform
NIS
Our Readers' Opinions
February 3, 2023

National Insurance Services and Pension Reform

EDITOR: Currently, the NIS is conducting a public dialogue on pension reform and has expressed concern about the fact that a public servant can become eligible for a pension that is higher than his or her final salary (up to 127% of final salary) when a pension from the NIS and a pension from the Consolidated Fund are combined. This possibility has been presented as clear evidence of the need for adjustments and the Editor of the News newspaper expressed support for this point of view in his editorial of 16th December 2022.

I think we are dealing with a clear anomaly. However, there are mitigating factors. I would like to point out that a public servant can only become eligible for a pension that is 127% of his or her final salary if he or she has made NIS contributions for more than 40 years and at the same time qualifies for the highest level of public pension. In light of the fact that the NIS which was founded in 1987 is not yet 40 years old, this is only a hypothetical possibility at this time.

Moreover, the NIS pension is determined by reference to the monthly insurable wages of an individual which are capped at $4,333.00.

This means that if an individual earns a salary of $10,000.00 and has an NIS replacement rate of 60 percent, this individual will receive 60% of $4,333.00 (NOT 60% of $10,000.00) in NIS pension. Ultimately, this person would receive only roughly 26% of his or her actual final salary in pension from the NIS.

Notwithstanding these facts, it is true to say that there is already a group of people whose combined pension (from both the NIS and from the consolidated fund) is higher than their final salary.

I get the feeling that the NIS is more interested in talking about this issue to raise awareness about the need for pension reform rather than dealing with the problem.

From a practical standpoint, this matter can only be addressed by the NIS. The central government cannot adversely alter the pension entitlement of existing Public Servants.

However, we know that the NIS can change the terms and conditions of its pension.

For instance, the NIS can place a cap on the maximum possible combined pension receivable by a public servant at maybe 80% of final salary. I think this might help to solve the problem.

R. T. Luke V. Browne