The Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions says it welcomes the decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council to refuse leave to Vynnette Frederick and others, to appeal against the decision of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) and the Chief Magistrate either to take over and discontinue or to refuse to sign private criminal complaints which were made by Frederick and others.{{more}}
On November 4, 2013, the solicitors in London, England, representing the Director of Public Prosecutions and the Chief Magistrate were informed that the application by Frederick and others for leave to appeal to the Privy Council was refused by the Law Lords.
âWe have been notified by the Court that the Application for Permission to appeal has been refused on the ground that the Application did not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance,â the correspondence from Charles Russell LLP, the solicitors in London stated.
Previously, both the High Court and the Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal had ruled against the appellants in relation to the matters being taken over and discontinued.
âAs Director of Public Prosecutions, I believe that what can be termed the summary dismissal of the Application for Leave to Appeal by their Lordships of the Privy Council is a reaffirmation that the original decision was correct and an implicit approval of the Full Code Test detailed in the Code for Prosecutors. The Full Code Test requires all matters to be subject to first an evidential test and then a public interest test before any prosecution is proceeded with. It is the test that was applied in taking over and discontinuing the private criminal complaints laid by Linton Lewis, Nigel Stephenson and Marva Chance.
âThe Full Code Test will continue to be applied to all matters and cases where the threshold is not met will not be allowed to proceed,â DPP Colin Williams said in a release.
Facebook