Appealing for a System of National Honours
EVERYYEAR AS we approach NATIONAL HEROES DAY, the question that is asked most often is when will there be another National Hero? A number of names are called, people who, according to the criteria for deciding on National Heroes, do not qualify.The question is what determines when National Heroes are named?
My position is that we have so far not completed what we need to do with Chatoyer. A statue of Chatoyer had been promised for a long time. It is not even being talked about. Perhaps it could be placed at Chatoyer’s National Park or at some prominent place in Kingstown. What is prominent in Kingstown is a statue representing Vincentians who had fought in the World Wars, and we know the type of Vincentians they would have been.They were Vincentians, nonetheless. We have not done a good job with our first National Hero. A lot is still not known about him. Let him be featured, perhaps, much more in our schools. We tend to only remember him on March 14 which we celebrate as National Heroes Day, the day on which Chatoyer died after an ambush. In fact, to be historically correct, he died on March 15.That is however not an issue.
About ten years ago, probably, an appeal was made to submit names for national heroes. I submitted a document on George McIntosh, whom I believe should be our next National Hero.This can however wait. For many years I have been appealing for a system of National Honours. I happened to have known, because I saw it, the existence of a comprehensive document on a system of National Honours that was prepared by the then Minister of Culture, John Horne. I am not sure what happened to that document. It is perhaps still around, gathering dust somewhere. If this can be retrieved from wherever it is, it could be looked at again and updated. One of the good things about a system of National Honours is that the individuals on whom these honours are going to be bestowed will not, unlike the National Heroes system, have to be dead. There are persons in different fields who have done outstanding work and need to be recognised. Their areas of recognition might not be national, but community based.We all know of teachers, police, nurses, doctors, fisherfolk, farmers and others who have served their communities with distinction. Over the years the name Sarah Baptiste had been much talked about as a midwife in the North Windward area. She found herself sometimes in night walking through the villages delivering babies. And there were others, not necessarily midwives, performing outstanding work that has benefitted their communities.
Could we now shift our focus in this direction? When Chatoyer was selected there was at that time no serious competition. Added to this, many people had little knowledge of him, what he stood for and what was the basis of his acclamation. I was so embarrassed by this that I quickly in 2002 put together a small 31 page document entitled “CHATOYER (Chatawee) National Hero of St.Vincent and the Grenadines.” At least, some people, I hoped, had some understanding of who was their national hero. I had, moreover, worked along with the NationalYouth Council and other non-governmental organisations advocating for Chatoyer to be named the First National Hero. This bore fruit when on March 14, 1985, at a ceremony at Dorsetshire an Obelisk of Chatoyer was unveiled by the Minister of Culture, John Horne.There was then no turning back, but it took another 17 years before we officially declared him National Hero. In 2001, March 14 was declared a holiday and the next year the declaration came, and March 14 was declared National Heroes Day. It is now 26 years since. Let us now introduce a system of national honours and recognise those who have made outstanding contributions to the society but will never be considered National Heroes.
l Dr Adrian Fraser is a social commentator and historian
